Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs > Sports > Georgia Tech Football Message Board > How bad was our defense in 09? Total defense/Opponent's time of possession

 Moderated by: BuzzJacket Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
How bad was our defense in 09? Total defense/Opponent's time of possession  Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 03:55 pm
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
buzzwax
Letterman


Joined: Thu Jul 31st, 2008
Location: Cumming, Georgia USA
Posts: 1972
Status: 
Offline
alagold wrote: For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)

As Wrecks has jokingly said "The RFR are coming!".  Our RFR OL better be as good as advertised AND stay injury free.  While Gilbert wasn't going to win any popularity contests, losing 26 games of experience is going to hurt depth.  There are a lot of questions for 2010 season.

OL? unproven with 'potential' 

WR?  Hill and who?  Jackson or is he going to play AB?  Melton?

NT?  Lanier - unproven but has 'potential'

 

 



____________________
Paul Johnson: Yes we are trying to focus in state, but we'll go outside to take outstanding players. There are a lot of great football players in the state of georgia and I hope it would help build our fan base and be more important in rivalry games. I
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 04:04 pm
  PM Quote Reply
12th Post
buzzed02
Letterman


Joined: Wed Jun 11th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 3321
Status: 
Online
alagold wrote: For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)
I don't get why so many on this board are so pessimistic about our offense next year. Hell, we won 9 in '08 without an experienced QB. I have to assume the departures of bebe and JD is the main reason people think we'll take a step back. The loss of bebe is IMO much bigger than JD just because we some proven RBs, but our WRs are a big unknown. I think we'll see fewer dropped passes, which were something of a problem last year, because we will have some good competition for the WR spots. Stephen Hill will have a much bigger impact this year, barring injury of course, and we just need one more guy to step up.  I'm not saying the passing game will be night-and-day better than last year, but with an improved OL, I expect the offense to be AT LEAST as potent as it was last year.



____________________


Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 04:30 pm
  PM Quote Reply
13th Post
buzzwax
Letterman


Joined: Thu Jul 31st, 2008
Location: Cumming, Georgia USA
Posts: 1972
Status: 
Offline
buzzed02 wrote: alagold wrote: For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)
I don't get why so many on this board are so pessimistic about our offense next year. Hell, we won 9 in '08 without an experienced QB. I have to assume the departures of bebe and JD is the main reason people think we'll take a step back. The loss of bebe is IMO much bigger than JD just because we some proven RBs, but our WRs are a big unknown. I think we'll see fewer dropped passes, which were something of a problem last year, because we will have some good competition for the WR spots. Stephen Hill will have a much bigger impact this year, barring injury of course, and we just need one more guy to step up.  I'm not saying the passing game will be night-and-day better than last year, but with an improved OL, I expect the offense to be AT LEAST as potent as it was last year.

Hopefully Chris Jackson is as good as advertised.  Didn't he practive at AB last year?  Is he moving to WR as rumored?



____________________
Paul Johnson: Yes we are trying to focus in state, but we'll go outside to take outstanding players. There are a lot of great football players in the state of georgia and I hope it would help build our fan base and be more important in rivalry games. I
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 04:38 pm
  PM Quote Reply
14th Post
Confederatebuzz
Letterman


Joined: Sat May 12th, 2007
Location: The American Leviathan
Posts: 5865
Status: 
Offline
buzzed02 wrote: alagold wrote: For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)
I don't get why so many on this board are so pessimistic about our offense next year. Hell, we won 9 in '08 without an experienced QB. I have to assume the departures of bebe and JD is the main reason people think we'll take a step back. The loss of bebe is IMO much bigger than JD just because we some proven RBs, but our WRs are a big unknown. I think we'll see fewer dropped passes, which were something of a problem last year, because we will have some good competition for the WR spots. Stephen Hill will have a much bigger impact this year, barring injury of course, and we just need one more guy to step up.  I'm not saying the passing game will be night-and-day better than last year, but with an improved OL, I expect the offense to be AT LEAST as potent as it was last year.

+1. The offense will be FINE. If there was going to be a problem, it would've been '08 when nobody knew anything!!

Improve the defense from pathetic to average, and we should be competing for the ACC more years than not.



____________________
In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.

- Draft of Kentucky Resolutions of 1798
Thomas Jefferson
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 05:52 pm
  PM Quote Reply
15th Post
Yukonwreck
Letterman


Joined: Tue Oct 9th, 2007
Location: Lithia, Florida
Posts: 5383
Status: 
Offline
odw wrote: alagold wrote:
For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)

Interested in hearing you reasons as to why?

Personally I think we can.

- The OL will be better IMO, and that is 75% of ball control in any offense. Fewer square pegs, more years of experience in the system.

- Nesbitt will continue to improve.

-Yes Dwyer's gone, but IMO, the guys that we have to replace are better at running in traffic. He never seemed to care for it that much. So, we may lose the 30-50 yard carries, but I think we'll see fewer 1-2 yard gains.

- Thomas IMO is a system WR. Hill is/will be a better pure WR in every sense. His first year of off season training will help him build the muscle mass he lacks.


how do we look now with returning offensive line starts?? I hope it is about 50 like Alabama last year.;)

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123984090891223207.html

 

Last edited on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 05:55 pm by Yukonwreck

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 10:20 pm
  PM Quote Reply
16th Post
Geori
Member
 

Joined: Tue Aug 25th, 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 303
Status: 
Offline
People are skeptical because we are losing the #1 RB in college football, as well as the #4 WR. There's a pretty big drop off at a football factory like SC or Texas when that happens, even more so for a non-football factory like Tech.

Last edited on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 10:20 pm by Geori

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 10:42 pm
  PM Quote Reply
17th Post
TOHELLWITHUGA
Member


Joined: Tue Dec 9th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 363
Status: 
Offline
I believe that our D will be top5 in the ACC and top 30 in NCAA!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 10:57 pm
  PM Quote Reply
18th Post
mack
Letterman


Joined: Sat Dec 30th, 2006
Location: Wadley, Georgia USA
Posts: 8504
Status: 
Offline
AlabamaBuzz wrote: There was no doubt about the fact our defense was VERY bad. It seemed that during some games, we were allowing double digit yardage on first down plays. I am holding out a little hope that with some new player additions, a new DC, and a new system, the defense might be able to make a few more stops next year, but I realize that it will probably still be a major "work in progress". As CPJ basically used his offensive system to make the offense run without a great O-line, I am hoping that CAG can do a similar magic act with the defense.
I dont care where we finished last year,we must and I repeat we must do better this year.Our season depends on stopping folks so we can get the ball to the option guys so we need to get it done.Hope Old Al can work wonders.



____________________
Charles S. Mcmillan jr.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 10:59 pm
  PM Quote Reply
19th Post
mack
Letterman


Joined: Sat Dec 30th, 2006
Location: Wadley, Georgia USA
Posts: 8504
Status: 
Offline
buzzed02 wrote: alagold wrote: For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)
I don't get why so many on this board are so pessimistic about our offense next year. Hell, we won 9 in '08 without an experienced QB. I have to assume the departures of bebe and JD is the main reason people think we'll take a step back. The loss of bebe is IMO much bigger than JD just because we some proven RBs, but our WRs are a big unknown. I think we'll see fewer dropped passes, which were something of a problem last year, because we will have some good competition for the WR spots. Stephen Hill will have a much bigger impact this year, barring injury of course, and we just need one more guy to step up.  I'm not saying the passing game will be night-and-day better than last year, but with an improved OL, I expect the offense to be AT LEAST as potent as it was last year.
I agree and the way it looks is that nobody has a great way to stop the option so after three years of play we will be ready to let it roll,yes I will miss JD and BeBe but we have some good guys left in the house and they will come through.I would think after three summers and springs we can fine tune this option to a higher level.I sure hope so.



____________________
Charles S. Mcmillan jr.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 11:06 pm
  PM Quote Reply
20th Post
gary faulkner
Letterman


Joined: Wed Sep 2nd, 2009
Location: Macon
Posts: 591
Status: 
Offline
mack wrote: buzzed02 wrote: alagold wrote: For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)
I don't get why so many on this board are so pessimistic about our offense next year. Hell, we won 9 in '08 without an experienced QB. I have to assume the departures of bebe and JD is the main reason people think we'll take a step back. The loss of bebe is IMO much bigger than JD just because we some proven RBs, but our WRs are a big unknown. I think we'll see fewer dropped passes, which were something of a problem last year, because we will have some good competition for the WR spots. Stephen Hill will have a much bigger impact this year, barring injury of course, and we just need one more guy to step up.  I'm not saying the passing game will be night-and-day better than last year, but with an improved OL, I expect the offense to be AT LEAST as potent as it was last year.
I agree and the way it looks is that nobody has a great way to stop the option so after three years of play we will be ready to let it roll,yes I will miss JD and BeBe but we have some good guys left in the house and they will come through.I would think after three summers and springs we can fine tune this option to a higher level.I sure hope so.
I was told two years ago that we would have an attacking def. So far I haven't seen it.  Maybe this year.  It worked well for NO last night.



____________________
GT Safty 28
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 12:44 am Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  Next Page Last Page    
Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs > Sports > Georgia Tech Football Message Board > How bad was our defense in 09? Total defense/Opponent's time of possession Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems