| ||||
Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs > Sports > Georgia Tech Football Message Board > How bad was our defense in 09? Total defense/Opponent's time of possession |
| Moderated by: BuzzJacket | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
|
|||||||||||||
| How bad was our defense in 09? Total defense/Opponent's time of possession | Rating:
|
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:29 pm |
|
1st Post |
|
buzzed02 Letterman
|
To account for our offense's outstanding time of possession, I decided to look at how we ranked nationally in Total Defense/opponent's time of possession. We gave up about 13.8 yrds/minute. That ranks 95th nationally, or better than only the following teams: Bowling Green Toledo New Mexico State Nevada North Texas Western Michigan Notre Dame Texas A&M Tulane San Jose State Stanford UTEP Eastern Michigan UAB Utah State Rice Fresno State Idaho Florida International Florida State Memphis UNLV Washington State Western Kentucky Florida Atlantic TCU, Texas, and Florida were the top 3 giving up about 8.5 yrds/minute Last edited on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:32 pm by buzzed02 ____________________ |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:45 pm |
|
2nd Post |
|
That_Guy Letterman
|
Anyone else notice that Notre Dame was even worse? Those of you calling for Tenuta to be back may want to reconsider. Where's UVA on the list?
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:45 pm |
|
3rd Post |
|
AlabamaBuzz Letterman
|
There was no doubt about the fact our defense was VERY bad. It seemed that during some games, we were allowing double digit yardage on first down plays. I am holding out a little hope that with some new player additions, a new DC, and a new system, the defense might be able to make a few more stops next year, but I realize that it will probably still be a major "work in progress". As CPJ basically used his offensive system to make the offense run without a great O-line, I am hoping that CAG can do a similar magic act with the defense.
____________________ BEE'85 “I don’t want to leave the impression that it’s not important. It is important. But I’m going to get Georgia Tech to the point where our program is bigger than one game.” |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:52 pm |
|
4th Post |
|
buzzed02 Letterman
|
That_Guy wrote: Anyone else notice that Notre Dame was even worse? Those of you calling for Tenuta to be back may want to reconsider. Where's UVA on the list? UVA was 29th...NCST (in case we get McCollum) was 56th. Not great, but a hell of a lot better than 95th.
____________________ |
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:58 pm |
|
5th Post |
|
buzzed02 Letterman
|
Rankings of BCS teams: 1 TCU 2 Texas 3 Florida 7 Ohio State 8 Bama 9 Iowa 12 Oregon 17 Boise 28 Cincy 95 GT Only those in the top 10 had any shot at the NC, and Cincy was clearly outmatched by UF. Last edited on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:59 pm by buzzed02 ____________________ |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 02:59 pm |
|
6th Post |
|
odw Member
|
Yuck, that's terrible. Hope Groh can work some magic next year, but I'll understand if it takes a couple of years. The main thing I'll be looking for it clear progress.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 03:07 pm |
|
7th Post |
|
ramblinwrek96ee Member
|
buzzed02 wrote: Rankings of BCS teams: It's just amazing that we even ended up in a BCS game or even had as great of a season as we had. I was going to try and do a similar breakdown (just normalize stats wrt TOP), but your breakdown is much better. Yeah... it shows how awful our D was last year, and how good our O was. We really can't do much worse.. even if it takes a year to get back on track, it'll be worth it. The list above speaks volumes.
____________________ Go Jackets! |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 03:12 pm |
|
8th Post |
|
alagold Letterman
|
For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down)
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 03:34 pm |
|
9th Post |
|
buzzwax Letterman
|
buzzed02 wrote: Rankings of BCS teams: Nice analysis! Loved CPJ's response to a question in post recruiting press conference. To this effect "any particular reason you recruited so many on the defensive side of the ball?" CPJ "Didn't you see us play? (several laughs)"
____________________ Paul Johnson: Yes we are trying to focus in state, but we'll go outside to take outstanding players. There are a lot of great football players in the state of georgia and I hope it would help build our fan base and be more important in rivalry games. I |
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 03:40 pm |
|
10th Post |
|
odw Member
|
alagold wrote:For those that think all we have to do is improve our DEF from 95 to 70 and we'll be BCS easy , dream on.Our Off will NOT score nor control ball like we did last yr.(again ,what happens if Nesbitt goes down) Interested in hearing you reasons as to why? Personally I think we can. - The OL will be better IMO, and that is 75% of ball control in any offense. Fewer square pegs, more years of experience in the system. - Nesbitt will continue to improve. -Yes Dwyer's gone, but IMO, the guys that we have to replace are better at running in traffic. He never seemed to care for it that much. So, we may lose the 30-50 yard carries, but I think we'll see fewer 1-2 yard gains. - Thomas IMO is a system WR. Hill is/will be a better pure WR in every sense. His first year of off season training will help him build the muscle mass he lacks.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 12:42 am | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs > Sports > Georgia Tech Football Message Board > How bad was our defense in 09? Total defense/Opponent's time of possession | Top |